Managing Refunds and Disputes in Revenue Platforms: Technical Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416.IJAIBDCMS-V7I3P105Keywords:
Refunds, Disputes, Revenue Platforms, Workflow Automation, Payment Processor Integration, Machine Learning, Fraud Detection, Data Integrity, Customer SatisfactionAbstract
Revenue platforms play a central role in e-commerce and digital services as well as in the development and market offers. With the growing use of online transactions, the issue of refunding and handling disputes has become very important. In this paper, several technical facets of handling refunds and disputes in revenue platforms, with emphasis on the workflow with payment processors, are discussed. This is not just a matter of handling refunds and turning into disputes but also of delivering a satisfactory service that meets the customer's expectations and, at the same time, is cost-effective in terms of company operations. In the current system, there is increased transaction turnover in the digital economy, and this means that there is a need to have well-packaged refund and dispute measures. Manual handling is very costly and time-consuming and results in customer complaints, thus incurring a loss on the side of the company. To solve these issues, today’s revenue platforms are opting for automated versions of it to minimize errors and create a better experience for customers. Hence, this paper has ample discussion of the technical solutions that can be utilized to deal with refunds and disputes efficiently. Here, we go deeper into understanding revenue platforms’ architecture and the possibilities of incorporating WFA. The paper also analyses the implementation of payment processors, focusing on API as the means of connecting platforms and third parties. Specific technical issues addressed are the application of machine learning techniques in the identification of fraudulent activities, monitoring of real-time transactions, and the subsequent automation of claims management. Furthermore, the paper also elaborates on the different approaches that ensure the data is valid and secured, mostly in cases where the organization is bound to this act. The GDPR Act is an example. As part of the study, there is a literatures review that describes current practices as well as trending developments in handling refunds and related disputes. In supporting the research paper, this is illustrated through various case-taking examples that explain the technical trend in real life. Based on the information, the platforms that implement automatized work scenes and interact with payment processors can improve the possibilities of operating refunds and disputes and improve customer satisfaction and work effectiveness. Last, of all, the paper provides a conclusion and a discussion about the future of this line of research as well as the difficulties that can be encountered in this process, which can help to define how the revenue platforms will adapt to the requirements of the digital commerce world.
References
1. Accounts Receivable Dispute management: Process & Resolution, online. https://www.highradius.com/resources/Blog/accounts-receivable-dispute-management-process-resolution/
2. Nwosu, N. T. (2024). Reducing operational costs in healthcare through advanced BI tools and data integration. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 22(3), 1144-1156.
3. Richards, G. (2017). Warehouse management: a complete guide to improving efficiency and minimizing costs in the modern warehouse. Kogan Page Publishers.
4. Mullangi, K. (2023). Innovations in Payment Processing: Integrating Accelerated Testing for Enhanced Security. American Digits: Journal of Computing and Digital Technologies, 1(1), 18-32.
5. Snellman, H. (2004). Integration of payment systems. Financial integration, 1913.
6. Farrow, G. (2012). Patterns for payment systems integration. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, 6(1), 15-36.
7. Khan, A. (2024). Financial Management for Business Success: Maximizing Resources, Minimizing Risks. Journal of Business Management, 3(01), 1-10.
8. Aleskerova, Y., Kolomiiets, M., & Karpinskyi, Y. Financial planning in the enterprise as a method of minimizing financial risks. Інфраструктура ринку. 2024. Вип. 78. С. 53-58. URL: http://www. market-infr. od. ua/journals/2024/78_2024/12. pdf DOI: https://doi. org/10.32782/infrastruct78-10.
9. Podkolzina, I. M., Belousov, A. I., Uzdenova, F. M., Romanko, L. V., & Chernikova, O. A. (2019, October). Forms of financial fraud and ways to minimize risks. In Institute of Scientific Communications Conference (pp. 2197-2205). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
10. Coviello, G., Avitabile, G., & Florio, A. (2020, June). The importance of data synchronization in multiboard acquisition systems. In 2020 IEEE 20th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON) (pp. 293-297). IEEE.
11. Barros, S., Bodhuin, T., Escudie, A., Queille, J. P., & Voidrot, J. F. (1995, October). Supporting impact analysis: a semi-automated technique and associated tool. In Proceedings of International Conference on Software Maintenance (pp. 42-51). IEEE.
12. Hoover, J. N. (2013). Compliance in the ether: Cloud computing, data security and business regulation. J. bus. & tech. l., 8, 255.
13. Popescu, C. (2018). A secure and efficient payment protocol based on ElGamal cryptographic algorithms. Electronic Commerce Research, 18, 339-358.
14. Feldman, P., Frazelle, A. E., & Swinney, R. (2018). Service delivery platforms: Pricing and revenue implications. Available at SSRN, 3258739.
15. Jia, J. (2016). Managing the revenue of sales platforms: Insights into service fees. Production and Operations Management, 25(6), 1026-1037.
16. Raymond, A. H., & Stemler, A. (2014). Trusting strangers: Dispute resolution in the crowd. Cardozo J. Conflict Resol., 16, 357.
17. Hagiu, A. (2014). Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 71.
18. Trigger, J. P., & Cameron, A. F. (1998). New technology for reducing operational costs. BT technology journal, 16(4), 152-164.
19. Bauer, E. (2018). Improving operational efficiency of applications via cloud computing. IEEE Cloud Computing, 5(1), 12-19.
20. Schüritz, R., Seebacher, S., & Dorner, R. (2017). Capturing value from data: Revenue models for data-driven services.