Social Media Bot Fraud and Automated Abuse: Detection, Risk Scoring, and Real-Time Mitigation Frameworks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416.IJAIBDCMS-V7I2P118Keywords:
Bot Detection, Social Media Fraud, Coordinated Behavior, Machine Learning, Network Analysis, Anomaly DetectionAbstract
The exponential growth of social media platforms has transformed global communication while simultaneously expanding the digital attack surface for malicious activities. Modern platforms that rely on user-generated content and engagement-driven algorithms have become increasingly vulnerable to bot-driven fraud, coordinated manipulation, and impersonation attacks. These threats undermine information integrity, distort public discourse, and expose users to phishing, spam, and large-scale abuse. This study presents a comprehensive detection framework that integrates multi-dimensional feature engineering with hybrid machine learning and graph-based analytics to address the evolving complexity of automated attacks. The proposed approach captures account-level attributes, behavioral patterns, content characteristics, and network interactions to distinguish between legitimate users and coordinated malicious entities. In addition, a dynamic behavioral risk scoring mechanism is introduced to evaluate the likelihood of automation and malicious intent in real time, enabling adaptive and prioritized response strategies. Temporal analysis is incorporated to identify synchronized activities and burst patterns commonly associated with coordinated bot campaigns. Experimental evaluation demonstrates improved detection accuracy and enhanced visibility into coordinated attack structures compared to traditional approaches. The findings highlight the effectiveness of combining behavioral analytics with network intelligence in identifying sophisticated bot activities. The proposed framework offers a scalable and explainable solution for modern content moderation systems, supporting timely intervention while maintaining transparency and fairness in automated decision-making processes.
References
1. Cresci, S. (2020). A decade of social bot detection. Communications of the ACM, 63(10), 72-83.
2. Hayawi, K., Saha, S., Masud, M. M., Mathew, S. S., & Kaosar, M. (2023). Social media bot detection with deep learning methods: a systematic review. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(12), 8903-8918.
3. Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96-104.
4. Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2017, May). Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media (Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 280-289).
5. Kudugunta, S., & Ferrara, E. (2018). Deep neural networks for bot detection. Information Sciences, 467, 312-322.
6. Alothali, E., Zaki, N., Mohamed, E. A., & Alashwal, H. (2018, November). Detecting social bots on twitter: a literature review. In 2018 International conference on innovations in information technology (IIT) (pp. 175-180). IEEE.
7. Cao, Q., Yang, X., Yu, J., & Palow, C. (2014, November). Uncovering large groups of active malicious accounts in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security (pp. 477-488).
8. Subrahmanian, V. S., Azaria, A., Durst, S., Kagan, V., Galstyan, A., Lerman, K., ... & Menczer, F. (2016). The DARPA Twitter bot challenge. Computer, 49(6), 38-46.
9. Gilani, Z., Farahbakhsh, R., Tyson, G., Wang, L., & Crowcroft, J. (2017, July). Of bots and humans (on twitter). In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining 2017 (pp. 349-354).
10. Yang, K. C., Varol, O., Hui, P. M., & Menczer, F. (2020, April). Scalable and generalizable social bot detection through data selection. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 34, No. 01, pp. 1096-1103).
11. Davis, C. A., Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2016, April). Botornot: A system to evaluate social bots. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference companion on world wide web (pp. 273-274).
12. Chavoshi, N., Hamooni, H., & Mueen, A. (2016, December). Debot: Twitter bot detection via warped correlation. In Icdm (Vol. 18, pp. 28-65).
13. Zhou, Y., Cheng, G., Jiang, S., & Dai, M. (2020). Building an efficient intrusion detection system based on feature selection and ensemble classifier. Computer networks, 174, 107247.
14. Boshmaf, Y., Muslukhov, I., Beznosov, K., & Ripeanu, M. (2011, December). The socialbot network: when bots socialize for fame and money. In Proceedings of the 27th annual computer security applications conference (pp. 93-102).
15. Stringhini, G., Kruegel, C., & Vigna, G. (2010, December). Detecting spammers on social networks. In Proceedings of the 26th annual computer security applications conference (pp. 1-9).
16. Ratkiewicz, J., Conover, M., Meiss, M., Gonçalves, B., Patil, S., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011, March). Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web (pp. 249-252).
17. Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Yang, K. C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2018). The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature communications, 9(1), 4787.
18. Zannettou, S., Caulfield, T., De Cristofaro, E., Sirivianos, M., Stringhini, G., & Blackburn, J. (2019, May). Disinformation warfare: Understanding state-sponsored trolls on Twitter and their influence on the web. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference (pp. 218-226).
19. Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter, 19(1), 22-36.
20. Shukla, P. K., Veerasamy, B. D., Alduaiji, N., Addula, S. R., Pandey, A., & Shukla, P. K. (2025). Fraudulent account detection in social media using hybrid deep transformer model and hyperparameter optimization. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 38447.