Risk Assessment and Detection Systems in Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects: A Case-Based Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416.IJAIBDCMS-V5I2P119Keywords:
Infrastructure Projects, Risk Assessment, Qualitative Techniques, Quantitative Analysis, Risk MitigationAbstract
The nature of mega infrastructure projects is that they are prone to various risks due to technical, managerial, environmental and financial uncertainties. Cost, time, quality, safety, and sustainability-wise, project goals must be achieved through thorough risk assessment and mitigation. The review gives a thorough analysis of qualitative, quantitative and hybrid methods of construction risk analysis that are underway. Qualitative methods such as fuzzy logic systems, expert judgment and Delphi method help in the initial evaluation of the project where there are few numerical data. Quantitative approaches that lend themselves to mathematical estimates of risk impacts and decision-making accuracy include sensitivity analysis, decision trees, and Monte Carlo simulation. Simultaneously, the next-generation approaches based on the combination of machine-learning algorithms and Building Information Modelling (BIM) provide a better predictive value and visualization capabilities in real time in the framework of the complex infrastructure. The paper also discusses mitigation measures at the project planning, engineering controls and financial instruments with contexts on risk allocation, contingency planning, structural redundancy, regulatory compliance, construction insurance and hedging mechanisms. An example of a smart building project shows the practical implementation of these techniques based on a Decision Tree classifier to predict risks based on data, which has high precision, recall, and strength.
References
1. S. Garg, “AI/ML Driven Proactive Performance Monitoring, Resource Allocation and Effective Cost Management in SaaS Operations,” Int. J. Core Eng. Manag., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 263–273, 2019.
2. H. Suzuki, R. Cervero, and K. Iuchi, Transforming Cities with Transit: Transit and Land-Use Integration for Sustainable Urban Development. World Bank Publications, 2013.
3. M. Javid, “Public and Private Infrastructure Investment and Economic Growth in Pakistan: An Aggregate and Disaggregate Analysis,” MDPI, vol. 11, no. 12, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11123359.
4. K. H. Rose, “A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) Fifth Edition,” Proj. Manag. J., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. e1–e1, 2013, doi: 10.1002/pmj.21345.
5. M. Jacobsson and P. Roth, “Towards a shift in mindset: partnering projects as engagement platforms,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 419–432, 2014, doi: 10.1080/01446193.2014.895847.
6. R. F. A. Eskander, “Risk assessment influencing factors for Arabian construction projects using analytic hierarchy process,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 4207–4218, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.10.018.
7. S. E. Ramona, “Advantages and Disadvantages of Quantitative and Qualitative Information Risk Approaches,” Chinese Bus. Rev., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1106–1110, 2011.
8. U. Kose, “Fundamentals of Fuzzy Logic with an Easy-to-use , Interactive Fuzzy Control Application,” Int. J. Mod. Eng. Res., vol. 2, no. 3, 2012.
9. R. Turisová, J. Mihok, and J. Kádárová, “Verification of the Risk Assessment Model through an Expert Judgment,” Qual. Innov. Prosper., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 37–48, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.12776/qip.v16i1.60.
10. A. Sourani and M. Sohail, “The Delphi Method: Review and Use in Construction Management Research,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 54–76, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/15578771.2014.917132.
11. V. Platon and A. Constantinescu, “Monte Carlo Method in risk analysis for investment,” ScienceDirect, vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 393–400, 2014, doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00463-8.
12. C. Vorakulpipat, Y. Rezgui, and C. J. Hopfe, “Value creating construction virtual teams: A case study in the construction sector,” Autom. Constr., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 142–147, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.016.
13. S. Garg, “Predictive Analytics and Auto Remediation using Artificial Inteligence and Machine learning in Cloud Computing Operations,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Eng. Multidiscip. Phys. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15362327.
14. S. Zhang, J. Teizer, J.-K. Lee, C. M. Eastman, and M. Venugopal, “Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Safety: Automatic Safety Checking of Construction Models and Schedules,” Autom. Constr., vol. 29, pp. 183–195, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.05.006.
15. K. C. Lam, D. Wang, P. T. K. Lee, and Y. T. Tsang, “Modelling risk allocation decision in construction contracts,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 485–493, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.005.
16. O. Akinradewo, C. Aigbavboa, A. Oke, and H. Coffie, “Appraisal of risk contingency planning for construction projects,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 640, no. 1, p. 012019, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/640/1/012019.
17. C. C. Cantarelli, B. Flyvbjerg, E. J. E. Molin, and B. Van Wee, “Cost Overruns in Large-scale Transportation Infrastructure Projects: Explanations and Their Theoretical Embeddedness,” Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res., vol. 10, pp. 5–18, 2010, doi: 10.18757/EJTIR.2010.10.1.2864.
18. M. O. Beiler, S. McNeil, D. Ames, and R. Gayley, “Identifying Resiliency Performance Measures for Megaregional Planning: Case Study of the Transportation Corridor Between Boston, Massachusetts, and Washington, D.C.,” Transp. Res. Rec., vol. 2397, no. 1, pp. 153–160, 2013, doi: 10.3141/2397-18.
19. E. Zio, “Critical Infrastructures Vulnerability and Risk Analysis,” Eur. J. Secur. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 97–114, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s41125-016-0004-2.
20. B. Flyvbjerg, “What you Should Know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview,” Proj. Manag. J., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 6–19, 2014, doi: 10.1002/pmj.21409.
21. M. K. Sharma, L.-E. Administration, and F. Management, “Infrastructure Project Financing In India : Challenges And Opportunities,” IJCRT, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 352–363, 2013.
22. A. Babu and S. Kanchana, “Role Of Insurance In Construction And Infrastructure Projects,” IJCIET, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 206–210, 2014.
23. S. Yang, Y. Shi, and F. Guo, “Risk Assessment of Industrial Internet System By Using Game-Attack Graphs,” in 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), 2019, pp. 1660–1663. doi: 10.1109/ICCC47050.2019.9064444.
24. M. Touhiduzzaman, S. N. G. Gourisetti, C. Eppinger, and A. Somani, “A Review of Cybersecurity Risk and Consequences for Critical Infrastructure,” in 2019 Resilience Week (RWS), 2019, pp. 7–13. doi: 10.1109/RWS47064.2019.8971975.
25. X. Pan, “An Assessment Model of Progress and Risk for Substation Construction Under the Background of Energy Internet,” in 2018 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), 2018, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.1109/EI2.2018.8582643.
26. K. Pawthaisong, M. Jongprasithporn, C. Vongpisal, and N. Yodpijit, “Risk Assessment Among Thai and Foreign Workers in Construction Companies,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2018, pp. 103–107. doi: 10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607328.
27. T. T. Pham and C. T. Phan, “Risk management: Awareness, Identification and Mitigation in Public Private Partnerships of Technical infrastructure Projects in Da Nang,” in 2018 4th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD), 2018, pp. 18–23. doi: 10.1109/GTSD.2018.8595510.
28. M. Zhang, Z. Bai, and X. Zhao, “Real-time risk assessment for construction workers’ trunk posture using mobile sensor,” in 2017 International Conference on Robotics and Automation Sciences (ICRAS), 2017, pp. 153–157. doi: 10.1109/ICRAS.2017.8071935.
29. Mamidala, J. V., Enokkaren, S. J., Attipalli, A., Bitkuri, V., Kendyala, R., & Kurma, J. (2023). Machine Learning Models Powered by Big Data for Health Insurance Expense Forecasting. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies IRJEMS, 2(1).
30. Nadella, V. M. (2023). Zero Trust Architecture for Telecom Operations. International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology, 4(3), 115-129.
31. Bitkuri, V., Kendyala, R., Kurma, J., Enokkaren, S. J., & Mamidala, J. V. (2023). Forecasting Stock Price Movements With Deep Learning Models for time Series Data Analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing. SRC/JAICC-531. DOI: doi. org/10.47363/JAICC/2023 (2), 489, 2-9.
32. Nadella, V. M. (2023). Anomaly Detection and Fault Prediction using ML in Telecom Operations. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 4(3), 134-143.
33. Kosaraju, P., & Nadella, V. M. (2022). Security and Privacy in IoT Ecosystems. Universal Library of Engineering Technology, (Issue).
34. Singh, A. A. S. S., Mania, V., Kothamaram, R. R., Rajendran, D., Namburi, V. D. N., & Tamilmani, V. (2023). Exploration of Java-Based Big Data Frameworks: Architecture, Challenges, and Opportunities. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing, 2(4), 1-8.
35. Routhu, K. K. (2023). AI-driven succession planning in Oracle HCM Cloud: Building resilient leadership pipelines through predictive analytics. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 11(5).
36. Tamilmani, V., Namburi, V. D., Singh Singh, A. A., Maniar, V., Kothamaram, R. R., & Rajendran, D. (2023). Real-Time Identification of Phishing Websites Using Advanced Machine Learning Methods. Available at SSRN 5837142.
37. Routhu, K. K. (2023). AI-driven succession planning in Oracle HCM Cloud: Building resilient leadership pipelines through predictive analytics. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17292018
38. From Fragmentation to Focus: The Benefits of Centralizing Procurement. (2023). International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 6(6), 9820-9833. https://doi.org/10.15662/
39. Routhu, K. K. (2023). Embedding fairness into the digital enterprise, data driven DEI strategies with Oracle HCM Analytics. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(8), 266-274.
40. Routhu, K. K. (2023). AI-driven skills forecasting in Oracle HCM Cloud: From static competencies to predictive workforce design. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 11(1).
41. Padur, S. K. R. (2023). AI-Augmented Enterprise ERP Modernization: Zero-Downtime Strategies for Oracle E-Business Suite R12. 2 and Beyond. Available at SSRN 5605510.
42. Routhu, K. K. (2022). From Case Management to Conversational HR: Redefining Help Desks with Oracle’s AI and NLP Framework. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 10(6).
43. Vattikonda, N., Gupta, A. K., Polu, A. R., Narra, B., Buddula, D. V. K. R., & Patchipulusu, H. H. S. (2022). Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain and Logistics: A Comprehensive Review of Applications, Challenges, and Innovations. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 3(3), 72-80.
44. Attipalli, A., BITKURI, V., Mamidala, J. V., Kendyala, R., & KURMA, J. (2022). Empowering Cloud Security with Artificial Intelligence: Detecting Threats Using Advanced Machine learning Technologies. Available at SSRN 5741263.
45. Padur, S. K. R. (2022). Intelligent resource management: AI methods for predictive workload forecasting in cloud data centers. J. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. & Data Sci, 1(1), 2936-2941.
46. Nadella, V. M. (2022). Digital Twins for Predictive Network Management and System Simulation. International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies, 3(3), 100-111.
47. Routhu, K. K. (2022). From RFID to Geofencing: IoT-Enabled Smart Time Tracking in Oracle HCM Cloud. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 10(4).
48. Nadella, V. (2019). Extracting road traffic data through video analysis using automatic camera calibration and deep neural networks.
49. Polam, R. M., Kamarthapu, B., Kakani, A. B., Nandiraju, S. K. K., Chundru, S. K., & Vangala, S. R. (2022). Data Security in Cloud Computing: Encryption, Zero Trust, and Homomorphic Encryption. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 3(4), 31-41.
50. Padur, S. K. R. (2022). AI augmented platform engineering, transforming developer experience through intelligent automation and self optimizing internal platforms. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 10(5), 10-5281.
51. Kosaraju, P. , & Nadella, V. M. (2021). Quality of Experience (QoE) and Network Performance Modelling for Multimedia Traffic. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.31586/jaibd.2021.1358