IDP SLOs: Measuring Developer Experience Gains
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416.IJAIBDCMS-V3I1P114Keywords:
IDP, Service Level Objectives, Developer Experience, Platform Engineering, Productivity Metrics, Cognitive Load, Software Delivery, Case Study, DevopsAbstract
Internal Developer Platforms (IDPs) have become significant contributors to the success of modern engineering organizations. They provide developers with self-service capacities, standard procedures, and safety mechanisms which make the issuing of software less complicated. However, while the advantages of a technical and operational nature of IDPs are the main aspects when presenting their benefits, measuring how they affect the developer experience is still a difficult task. That is when Service Level Objectives (SLOs), which are traditionally the main tool for monitoring system reliability, come in. They can be converted into a way of showing how IDPs affect the daily developers' outcomes. The paper describes a case study to facilitate the understanding of the method as it shows the extent to which it implemented the IDP SLOs to reveal the hidden bottlenecks, to show the flow of the developers, they can now have a better idea of which direction to take when platform changes need to be made. The major points revealed by the findings show that the implementation of experience-focused SLO was not only capable of delivery metric improvement but also played a role in increased levels of confidence and trust, which in turn led to reductions in frustration as well as giving actionable feedback on where the platform was providing value or not. According to the study, when developer experience becomes the focus and the same precision as system reliability is maintained, organizations are able to realize productivity and culture improvements that are sustainable over time.
References
1. Castillo, Vanessa, and Freddy Salgado. "The suited framework for international development project management: Enhancing flexibility in IDP." (2015).
2. Fagerholm, Fabian, and Jürgen Münch. "Developer experience: Concept and definition." 2012 international conference on software and system process (ICSSP). IEEE, 2012.
3. Ahmed, Ashiq. "Measuring developer experience of a digital platform." (2018).
4. Parakala, Adityamallikarjunkumar. "Building Analytics-Driven Bots: RPA Meets Business Intelligence." International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology 2.1 (2021): 77-87.
5. Skadberg, Yongxia Xia, and James R. Kimmel. "Visitors’ flow experience while browsing a Web site: its measurement, contributing factors and consequences." Computers in human behavior 20.3 (2004): 403-422.
6. Guntupalli, Bhavitha. "The Role of Metadata in Modern ETL Architecture." International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Machine Learning 2.3 (2021): 47-61.
7. Basili, Victor R. "Software modeling and measurement: the Goal/Question/Metric paradigm." (1992).
8. Hanushek, Eric. "Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: Estimation using micro data." The American Economic Review 61.2 (1971): 280-288.
9. Preece, Jenny. "Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success." Behaviour & Information Technology 20.5 (2001): 347-356.
10. Boers, Maarten, et al. "Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0." Journal of clinical epidemiology 67.7 (2014): 745-753.
11. Chollet, François. "On the measure of intelligence." arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.01547 (2019).
12. Chillarege, Ram, et al. "Orthogonal defect classification-a concept for in-process measurements." IEEE Transactions on software Engineering 18.11 (1992): 943-956.
13. Guntupalli, Bhavitha. "Unit Testing in ETL Workflows: Why It Matters and How to Do It." International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Machine Learning 2.4 (2021): 38-50.
14. Goldhammer, Frank. "Measuring ability, speed, or both? Challenges, psychometric solutions, and what can be gained from experimental control." Measurement: interdisciplinary research and perspectives 13.3-4 (2015): 133-164.
15. Parakala, Adityamallikarjunkumar, and Aaron Bell. "How Citizen Developers Changed the Game." American International Journal of Computer Science and Technology 3.5 (2021): 14-24.
16. Lev, Baruch. Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
17. Izraelevitz, Joseph, et al. "Basic performance measurements of the intel optane DC persistent memory module." arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.05714 (2019).
18. Bavota, Gabriele, et al. "An empirical study on the developers' perception of software coupling." 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, 2013.
19. Barua, Anton, Stephen W. Thomas, and Ahmed E. Hassan. "What are developers talking about? an analysis of topics and trends in stack overflow." Empirical software engineering 19.3 (2014): 619-654.
