AI-Driven Data Governance: Ensuring Compliance in Big Data Ecosystems

Authors

  • Ravikumar Mani Naidu Gunasekaran Independent Researcher, California, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416.ICAIDSCT26-130

Keywords:

AI-driven governance, data governance frameworks, regulatory compliance, big data ecosystems, automated compliance monitoring, ethical AI, data privacy, risk management, governance automation, AI auditing, policy enforcement, data lifecycle management, compliance analytics, enterprise data governance, trustworthy AI

Abstract

The explosion of big data has strained traditional data governance models that rely on manual controls, static policies, and siloed oversight. Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers a scalable, adaptive alternative that automates classification, lineage, quality assessments, and policy enforcement across heterogeneous data estates. This article presents a practical, end-to-end framework for AI-driven data governance, examines architectural patterns, evaluates implementation challenges and risks, and provides industry case studies, including banking (regulatory reporting, BCBS 239, AML/KYC), healthcare (PHI protection), and manufacturing (IoT) to illustrate how organizations can meet regulatory requirements while improving data quality and operational efficiency. Organizations today operate in increasingly complex data environments driven by exponential growth in data volume, diversity, and velocity. As regulatory expectations intensify across industries—particularly in banking, healthcare, and other compliance heavy sectors—traditional data governance approaches, which rely heavily on manual processes and static controls, are no longer sustainable. These methods struggle to scale, fail to manage unstructured and real time data, and often result in fragmented oversight, inconsistent policy enforcement, and costly audit cycles. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force capable of re reengineering the foundations of enterprise data governance. By automating critical functions such as data classification, metadata enrichment, lineage mapping, quality monitoring, and policy enforcement, AI enables organizations to shift from reactive compliance to proactive, continuous governance. Instead of relying on human stewards to manually inspect datasets, AI-driven systems can continuously scan and interpret data across lakes, warehouses, and streaming platforms—identifying risks, tagging sensitive fields, detecting anomalies, and enforcing policies in real time. This whitepaper presents a comprehensive framework for implementing AI-driven data governance within modern big data ecosystems. It outlines the architectural components required for scalable governance—ranging from ingestion and metadata services to AI-powered quality engines, policy as code platforms, and automated audit evidence generation. It also introduces a maturity model to help organizations progress from foundational governance capabilities toward fully autonomous, self healing systems. The paper examines real world applications across the financial sector, including BCBS 239 compliance, AML/KYC data quality, and regulatory reporting automation. These examples demonstrate how AI reduces operational risk, improves data trust, accelerates audit readiness, and strengthens regulatory confidence. Additional use cases in healthcare, manufacturing, and consumer analytics highlight the cross industry relevance of AI powered controls. As global regulations evolve and data complexity escalates, organizations must rethink governance as an intelligent, automated capability rather than a manual oversight function. AI-driven governance offers a path forward—enabling enterprises to enhance compliance, scale efficiently, and build resilient data ecosystems that support both regulatory stability and innovation. This whitepaper provides the guidance, architectural patterns, and practical steps necessary to execute this shift effectively.

References

1. DAMA International. The DAMA-DMBOK2: Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition). DAMA, 2017.

2. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), 2023.

3. NIST. Big Data Interoperability Framework (NBDIF), Volumes 1–9.

4. ISO/IEC 38505 1:2021. Governance of Data — Part 1: Application of ISO/IEC 38500 to the Governance of Data.

5. ISO 8000. Data Quality Standard, International Organization for Standardization.

6. Regulatory Documentation

7. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). BCBS 239: Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting, Bank for International Settlements, 2013.

8. European Union. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Regulation (EU) 2016/679.

9. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule, 1996.

10. U.S. Congress. Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX), 2002.

11. PCI Security Standards Council. PCI DSS: Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, v4.0.

12. AI, Metadata & Governance Literature

13. Amershi, S., et al. Guidelines for Human AI Interaction, CHI Conference, ACM, 2019.

14. Sicular, S. AI Augmented Data Management, Gartner Research, 2021.

15. Google Cloud. Dataplex: Unified Data Governance Architecture, Google Cloud Whitepaper, 2022.

16. Microsoft. Azure Purview / Microsoft Purview Governance Model, Microsoft Technical Documentation.

17. AWS. AWS Glue Data Catalog: Governance and Metadata Architecture, Amazon Web Services.

18. Academic & Technical Papers

19. Halevy, A., Norvig, P., & Pereira, F. “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, 24(2), 2009.

20. Abadi, D. “Data Management in the Modern Big Data Ecosystem,” Communications of the ACM, 2020.

21. Koutrika, G. “Metadata Management for Data Lakes,” Foundations and Trends in Databases, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

1.
Naidu Gunasekaran RM. AI-Driven Data Governance: Ensuring Compliance in Big Data Ecosystems. IJAIBDCMS [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 17 [cited 2026 Apr. 4];:262-75. Available from: https://ijaibdcms.org/index.php/ijaibdcms/article/view/420