Predictive Resource Orchestration for AI-Driven Healthcare Workloads in Multi-Data-Centre Cloud Migrations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416.IJAIBDCMS-V7I1P109Keywords:
Cloud Computing, Healthcare Workloads, AI-Driven Resource Orchestration, Multi-Data-Centre Migration, Predictive Scheduling, AutoscalingAbstract
Workload demands in healthcare are being significantly influenced by artificial intelligence (AI) and require substantial computing power, fast processing speed (low latency), as well as consistent and high-quality operation at dispersed locations around the globe through geographically distributed data centers. Cloud migration of multi-data-center systems presents major challenges related to the orchestration of resources due to variability of workload, heterogeneity of infrastructure, and the necessity for strict Service Level Agreements (SLAs). This paper presents a predictive resource orchestration framework that utilizes AI-based forecasted workloads to optimize the use of resources and scheduling of tasks as well as scaling of resources in the context of multiple cloud data centers. The predictive resource orchestration framework is made up of machine learning models used for predicting workloads and an adaptive scheduling algorithm for dynamic resource allocation based on forecasted demand for the minimization of latency, operating costs and SLA failures. Results from simulation studies indicate that the predictive resource orchestration framework provides better use of resources and shorter time to complete tasks than the heuristic or rule-based scheduling strategies that are commonly used today. The predictive resource orchestration framework represents a scalable method for the management of AI-driven health care workloads and provides both higher quality and higher reliability in the process of migrating applications between data centers of a multi-data-center cloud system.
References
[1] J. Chen, T. Du and G. Xiao, “A multi‑objective optimization for resource allocation of emergent demands in cloud computing,” Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 10, art. 20, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://journalofcloudcomputing.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13677-021-00237-7
[2] H. Zhang, et al., “Learning-driven hybrid scaling for multi-type services in cloud,” Future Generation Computer Systems, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0743731524000443
[3] S. Alharthi, A. Alshamsi, A. Alseiari, and A. Alwarafy, “Auto‑Scaling Techniques in Cloud Computing: Issues and Research Directions,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 17, art. 5551, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/17/5551
[4] “AI-enhanced modelling of queueing and scheduling systems in cloud computing,” Discover Applied Sciences, vol. 7, art. 276, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-025-06755-2
[5] “Advanced queueing and scheduling techniques in cloud computing using AI-based model order reduction,” Discover Computing, vol. 28, art. 75, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10791-025-09581-7
[6] “Enhanced Scheduling of AI Applications in Multi‑Tenant Cloud Using Genetic Optimizations,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 11, art. 4697, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/11/4697
[7] M. U. Hassan, A. A. Al-Awady, A. Ali, M. M. Iqbal, M. Akram, and H. Jamil, “Smart Resource Allocation in Mobile Cloud NGN Orchestration with Context‑Aware Data and Machine Learning for Cost Optimization of Microservice Applications,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 3, art. 865, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/3/865
[8] “Workflow scheduling in IaaS clouds with the optimal pairing between tasks and virtual machines,” Journal of King Saud University — Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 37, art. 237, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44443-025-00260-7
[9] N. Chatterjee, et al., “A Cloud‑Based System for Automated AI Image Analysis of Hepatic Steatosis: Proof‑of‑Concept Clinical Deployment,” Journal of Digital Imaging, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10278-024-01200-z
[10] V. K. Thiriveedhi, et al., “Cloud‑based large-scale curation of medical imaging data for AI‑driven lung screening: architecture and performance,” Scientific Reports / PMC, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11092813/
[11] T. Hao, J. Zhan, K. Hwang, W. Gao and X. Wen, “AI‑oriented medical workload allocation for hierarchical cloud/edge/device computing,” arXiv preprint, Feb. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.03493
[12] “A survey of cloud computing scheduling algorithms,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3233/MGS-220217
[13] M. Kumar, et al., “A comprehensive survey for scheduling techniques in distributed and cloud environments,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jnca.2019.06.006
[14] S. Alnajdi, M. Dogan, and E. Al‑Qahtani, “A survey on resource allocation in cloud computing,” International Journal on Cloud Computing: Services and Architecture, vol. 6, no. 5, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://aircconline.com/ijccsa/V6N5/6516ijccsa01.pdf
