Redefining ESG Compliance with Machine Learning and Predictive Analytics

Authors

  • Anup Kumar Gandhi Independent Researcher, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416.IJAIBDCMS-V6I2P108

Keywords:

ESG machine learning, predictive analytics ESG, AI-powered ESG compliance, ML-driven ESG risk assessment, ESG predictive modeling, AI in ESG reporting

Abstract

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) compliance has become a critical focus for organizations worldwide due to increasing regulatory demands, stakeholder expectations, and the dynamic nature of sustainability challenges. Traditional approaches to ESG compliance face significant limitations, including the lack of real-time insights, the complexity of unstructured data, and the inefficiency of static reporting mechanisms. This paper explores the transformative potential of machine learning (ML) and predictive analytics in redefining ESG compliance. By leveraging advanced computational techniques, organizations can achieve enhanced accuracy in risk assessment, real-time monitoring, and proactive decision-making. The study highlights key applications of ML, such as anomaly detection, natural language processing for ESG text data, and predictive modeling. Practical case studies across industries are discussed to illustrate the integration of these technologies into ESG strategies. Furthermore, the implications for business competitiveness, regulatory transparency, and ethical considerations are addressed. This paper contributes to the growing body of research advocating for technology-driven ESG solutions and offers a roadmap for future advancements

References

[1] Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Four things no one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 50–58.

[2] Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724.

[3] Gidwani, B. (2013). The link between ESG score and financial performance of companies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(1), 22–45.

[4] Rajpurkar, P., et al. (2017). CheXNet: Radiologist-level pneumonia detection on chest X-rays with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05225.

[5] Maiti, J., & Mitra, S. (2021). Application of machine learning in occupational accident prevention: A review. Safety Science, 138, 105215.

[6] Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.

[7] Zhan, J., & Tang, J. (2013). Application of predictive analytics in carbon footprint management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 46, 68–76.

[8] Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press.

[9] McKinsey & Company. (2020). Five ways that ESG creates value. Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com.

[10] García, D., & Schweitzer, F. (2019). Social resilience in online communities: The interplay of structural and dynamics factors. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–11.

[11] Breuer, C., et al. (2021). The role of ESG performance in predicting company default. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(1), 275–294.

[12] Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.

[13] Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.

[14] Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20–46.

[15] Wang, J., et al. (2020). A review of machine learning applications in human resource management. Journal of Business Research, 116, 347–359.

[16] Aghion, P., et al. (2016). Carbon taxes, path dependency, and directed technical change: Evidence from the auto industry. Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 1–51.

[17] European Commission. (2019). Guidelines on non-financial reporting: Supplement on reporting climate-related information. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu.

[18] TCFD. (2017). Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Retrieved from https://www.fsb-tcfd.org.

[19] Geerts, G. L., & O'Leary, D. E. (2014). A supply chain of things: The EAGLET ontology for highly visible supply chains. Decision Support Systems, 63, 3–22.

[20] Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2017). How blockchain is changing finance. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 2–5.

[21] Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

[22] Kroll, J. A., et al. (2016). Accountable algorithms. Communications of the ACM, 59(2), 56–62.

[23] Esteva, A., et al. (2017). Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature, 542(7639), 115–118.

[24] Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14.

[25] Liesen, A., et al. (2015). Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1047–1074.

[26] Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 149–159.

[27] Varian, H. R. (2014). Big data: New tricks for econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 3–28.

[28] Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.

[29] IEA. (2020). Tracking clean energy progress. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org.

[30] Hoepner, A. G. F., et al. (2016). ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 239–255.

[31] Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.

[32] Lipton, Z. C. (2016). The mythos of model interpretability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03490.

[33] Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O'Reilly Media.

[34] Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32(4), 288–302.

[35] Armbrust, M., et al. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50–58.

[36] Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

[37] Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Gandhi AK. Redefining ESG Compliance with Machine Learning and Predictive Analytics. IJAIBDCMS [Internet]. 2025 May 11 [cited 2025 Sep. 14];6(2):66-74. Available from: https://ijaibdcms.org/index.php/ijaibdcms/article/view/187