Predictive Compliance Radar Using Temporal-AI Fusion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416.IJAIBDCMS-V4I1P108Keywords:
Regulatory Compliance, Temporal AI, Predictive Analytics, LSTM, NLP, Transformer Models, Geospatial Mapping, HR Automation, Risk Management, Workforce Analytics, FMLA Compliance, Labor Law ViolationsAbstract
Organizations find it more difficult to maintain their compliance in the fast changing regulatory environment of the present day as few early signs of infractions usually go unnoticed until it is too late. Predictive Compliance Radar Utilizing Temporal-AI Fusion is a proactive solution meant to foresee their regulatory risk by use of advanced AI technologies. Using multimodal AI, the system mainly analyses temporal patterns, internal human resources data, legal information, & also jurisdiction-specific legislation changes by means of a mix of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks & also Transformer models. While Natural Language Processing (NLP) helps the system to examine their subsequent policy changes and staff interactions for hidden signs of non-compliance, geographical overlays improve the accuracy of detecting their legal concerns. Actual time detection of the present compliance risks is made possible by this fusion of temporal modelling, semantic analysis & also geolocation. Constant in adaptation to changing patterns of violations & also policy changes, the platform combines structured company information with their regulatory data. This creates an interactive dashboard alerting legal & HR staff of probable risks before they become more violations, therefore helping companies to match their internal processes with outside laws. Early implementation data show a significant drop in late-stage legal escalations, improved alignment between HR & compliance departments, and better agility in adjusting to jurisdictional regulatory changes. By combining improved predictive analytics with their contextual awareness, this approach converts compliance from a reactive obligation into a proactive effort
References
1. Kufoalor, D. Kwame Minde, et al. "Autonomous COLREGs-compliant decision making using maritime radar tracking and model predictive control." 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC). IEEE, 2019.
2. Desai, Vinit M. "Under the radar: Regulatory collaborations and their selective use to facilitate organizational compliance." Academy of Management Journal 59.2 (2016): 636-657.
3. Fleming, James, et al. "Real‐time predictive eco‐driving assistance considering road geometry and long‐range radar measurements." IET Intelligent Transport Systems 15.4 (2021): 573-583.
4. Veluru, Sai Prasad. “Streaming MLOps: Real-Time Model Deployment and Monitoring With Apache Flink”. Los Angeles Journal of Intelligent Systems and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, July 2022, pp. 223-45
5. Cui, Guolong, Antonio DeMaio, and Marco Piezzo. "Performance prediction of the incoherent radar detector for correlated generalized Swerling-chi fluctuating targets." IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 49.1 (2013): 356-368.
6. Kupunarapu, Sujith Kumar. "AI-Driven Crew Scheduling and Workforce Management for Improved Railroad Efficiency." International Journal of Science And Engineering 8.3 (2022): 30-37.
7. Forbes, Josephine M., Georgia Soldatos, and Merlin C. Thomas. "Below the Radar: Advanced Glycation End Products that Detour “around the side”: Is HbA1c not an accurate enough predictor of long term progression and glycaemic control in diabetes?." The Clinical biochemist. Reviews/Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists. 26.4 (2005): 123.
8. Yasodhara Varma. “Graph-Based Machine Learning for Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Real-World Implementation”. American Journal of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Innovations, vol. 2, June 2022, pp. 239-63
9. Eriksen, Bjørn‐Olav H., et al. "The branching‐course model predictive control algorithm for maritime collision avoidance." Journal of Field Robotics 36.7 (2019): 1222-1249.
10. Paidy, Pavan. “AI-Augmented SAST and DAST Integration in CI CD Pipelines”. Los Angeles Journal of Intelligent Systems and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, Feb. 2022, pp. 246-72
11. Johansen, Tor Arne, Tristan Perez, and Andrea Cristofaro. "Ship collision avoidance and COLREGS compliance using simulation-based control behavior selection with predictive hazard assessment." IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems 17.12 (2016): 3407-3422.
12. Ali Asghar Mehdi Syed, and Shujat Ali. “Evolution of Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions in Cloud Computing: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions”. JOURNAL OF RECENT TRENDS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ( JRTCSE), vol. 9, no. 2, Sept. 2021, pp. 56-71
13. Atluri, Anusha. “Insights from Large-Scale Oracle HCM Implementations: Key Learnings and Success Strategies ”. Los Angeles Journal of Intelligent Systems and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, Dec. 2021, pp. 171-89
14. de Campos Ferreira, Julio Cesar Bolzani, and Jacques Waldmann. "Covariance intersection-based sensor fusion for sounding rocket tracking and impact area prediction." Control Engineering Practice 15.4 (2007): 389-409.
15. Talakola, Swetha. “Automation Best Practices for Microsoft Power BI Projects”. American Journal of Autonomous Systems and Robotics Engineering, vol. 1, May 2021, pp. 426-48
16. Almunia, Miguel, and David Lopez-Rodriguez. "Under the radar: The effects of monitoring firms on tax compliance." American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 10.1 (2018): 1-38.
17. Veluru, Sai Prasad. “AI-Driven Data Pipelines: Automating ETL Workflows With Kubernetes”. American Journal of Autonomous Systems and Robotics Engineering, vol. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 449-73
18. Syed, Ali Asghar Mehdi, and Shujat Ali. “Linux Container Security: Evaluating Security Measures for Linux Containers in DevOps Workflows”. American Journal of Autonomous Systems and Robotics Engineering, vol. 2, Dec. 2022, pp. 352-75
19. Zwaga, J. H., and H. Driessen. "Tracking performance constrained MFR parameter control: applying constraints on prediction accuracy." 2005 7th International Conference on Information Fusion. Vol. 1. IEEE, 2005.
20. Vasanta Kumar Tarra, and Arun Kumar Mittapelly. “Predictive Analytics for Risk Assessment & Underwriting”. JOURNAL OF RECENT TRENDS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ( JRTCSE), vol. 10, no. 2, Oct. 2022, pp. 51-70
21. Sebastianelli, Alessandro, et al. "Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 spatio-temporal data fusion for clouds removal." arXiv e-print (2021).
22. Paidy, Pavan. “Zero Trust in Cloud Environments: Enforcing Identity and Access Control”. American Journal of Autonomous Systems and Robotics Engineering, vol. 1, Apr. 2021, pp. 474-97
23. Vela, Daniel, et al. "Temporal quality degradation in AI models." Scientific reports 12.1 (2022): 11654.
24. Talakola, Swetha, and Sai Prasad Veluru. “How Microsoft Power BI Elevates Financial Reporting Accuracy and Efficiency”. Newark Journal of Human-Centric AI and Robotics Interaction, vol. 2, Feb. 2022, pp. 301-23
25. Sebastianelli, Alessandro, et al. "Spatio-Temporal SAR-Optical Data Fusion for Cloud Removal via a Deep Hierarchical Model." arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.12226 (2021).
26. Atluri, Anusha. “Extending Oracle HCM Cloud With Visual Builder Studio: A Guide for Technical Consultants ”. Newark Journal of Human-Centric AI and Robotics Interaction, vol. 2, Feb. 2022, pp. 263-81
27. Johansen, Tor A., Andrea Cristofaro, and Tristan Perez. "Ship collision avoidance using scenario-based model predictive control." IFAC-PapersOnLine 49.23 (2016): 14-21.
28. Jin, Feng, et al. "Multiple patients behavior detection in real-time using mmWave radar and deep CNNs." 2019 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf). IEEE, 2019.
29. Aragani, V. M. (2022). “Unveiling the magic of AI and data analytics: Revolutionizing risk assessment and underwriting in the insurance industry”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering Research (IJAER), 24(VI), 1–13.
30. Mudunuri L.N.R.; (December, 2023); “AI-Driven Inventory Management: Never Run Out, Never Overstock”; International Journal of Advances in Engineering Research; Vol 26, Issue 6; 24-36
