Crossing Over: How Infrastructure as Code Bridges FinTech and Healthcare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416.IJAIBDCMS-V1I3P104Keywords:
Infrastructure as Code, FinTech, Healthcare, Automation, IT Infrastructure, Compliance, Data Security, Cloud Computing, DevOps, Regulation, Innovation, ScalabilityAbstract
In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, the convergence of FinTech and healthcare sectors is creating exciting new opportunities, driven by the adoption of Infrastructure as Code (IaC). As these industries strive to enhance efficiency, security, and scalability, IaC emerges as a pivotal tool, enabling the seamless integration of robust infrastructure management into their operations. This abstract delves into how IaC is not just a technological advancement but a bridge connecting the distinct worlds of finance and healthcare. By automating infrastructure deployment and management, IaC allows both sectors to accelerate innovation, reduce human error, and comply with stringent regulatory standards. The ability to treat infrastructure configurations as code provides unparalleled flexibility, allowing organizations to quickly adapt to changing demands and scale their services efficiently. For FinTech, this means faster, more secure financial transactions and the ability to handle increasing volumes of data with ease. In healthcare, it translates to improved patient care through the reliable and secure management of sensitive medical data. As these industries continue to overlap, IaC not only facilitates this synergy but also lays the foundation for future advancements. By focusing on the shared need for robust, secure, and scalable systems, IaC fosters a collaborative environment where FinTech and healthcare can jointly navigate the challenges of the digital age. This exploration underscores the transformative power of Infrastructure as Code in bridging two critical industries, driving them towards a future of enhanced service delivery and innovation
References
1. Nicoletti, B., & Nicoletti, B. (2018). Fintech and procurement finance 4.0. Procurement Finance: The Digital Revolution in Commercial Banking, 155-248.
2. Tsang, C. Y. (2019). From industry sandbox to supervisory control box: rethinking the role of regulators in the era of Fintech. U. Ill. JL Tech. & Pol'y, 355.
3. Giarelli, S. (2018). Fintech and financial inclusion: the case of Banco Maré (Doctoral dissertation).
4. Giraldo-Mora, J., Avital, M., & Hedman, J. (2019). Development Dynamics of Digital Infrastructure and Organization: The Case of Global Payments Innovation. In ICIS.
5. Erman, C. (2017). Financial technologies effect on financial services from an open innovation perspective.
6. Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Huang, Y., Shin, H. S., & Zbinden, P. (2019). BigTech and the changing structure of financial intermediation. Economic policy, 34(100), 761-799.
7. Hemmen, N. (2019). FINTECH & FINANCIAL INCLUSION.
8. Best, J. (2018). Breaking Digital Gridlock,+ Website: Improving Your Bank's Digital Future by Making Technology Changes Now. John Wiley & Sons.
9. Murthy, G., Fernandez-Vidal, M., Faz, X., & Barreto, R. (2019). FINTECHS.
10. Peat, J., Kelly, O., & Broby, D. (2017). Fintech: hype or reality?.
11. Swartz, D. E. (2015). Tokens, ledgers, and rails: The communication of money (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California).
12. Rathinasamy, D. (2016). Unleashing Data Potential with Data Divinity: Framework for Efficient Fintech-BNPL Data Lake. Global journal of Business and Integral Security.
13. Gozman, D., & Willcocks, L. (2015). Crocodiles in the regulatory swamp: navigating the dangers of outsourcing, SaaS and shadow IT.
14. Kemppainen, L. (2016). Business models for platform operators in MyData based ecosystem: context preventive healthcare (Master's thesis, L. Kemppainen).
15. TALENT, N., & INDEX, G. C. (2000). About this report.
