Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Fraud Detection across Financial Institutions

Authors

  • Sakthi Sankara Balaji Sathyamurthy Truist Financial Corporation, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416.IJAIBDCMS-V6I4P138

Keywords:

Federated Learning, Fraud Detection, Financial Institutions, Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning, Secure Aggregation, Differential Privacy, Financial Crime Analytics, Digital Banking Security, Collaborative Intelligence, Financial Technology

Abstract

Financial fraud has become increasingly sophisticated as digital banking, online payments, fintech platforms, and cross-border financial services continue to expand. Conventional fraud detection systems are often limited by institutional data silos, where each bank or financial organisation trains models only on its own transaction records. This restricts the ability to detect coordinated fraud patterns that move across multiple institutions. However, direct sharing of customer transaction data raises serious privacy, regulatory, commercial, and security concerns. Federated learning offers a promising solution by allowing financial institutions to collaboratively train fraud detection models without transferring raw data outside their local environments. This article examines the use of federated learning for privacy-preserving fraud detection across financial institutions. It outlines a framework in which participating institutions train local models on private transaction data and share protected model updates for secure aggregation into a global fraud detection model. The study further considers privacy-enhancing mechanisms such as secure aggregation, differential privacy, encrypted model updates, and model auditing. It also discusses key challenges, including non-identically distributed data, communication overhead, model poisoning, inference attacks, regulatory compliance, and explainability. The article argues that federated learning can improve collaborative fraud intelligence while maintaining stronger data protection, provided that technical safeguards, governance structures, and human oversight are properly implemented. The study contributes to the growing discussion on privacy-preserving artificial intelligence in financial crime detection and digital banking security.

References

1. Abdul Salam, M., Fouad, K. M., Elbably, D. L., & Elsayed, S. M. (2024). Federated learning model for credit card fraud detection with data balancing techniques. Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 6231–6256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-09410-2

2. Aljunaid, S. K., Almheiri, S. J., Dawood, H., & Khan, M. A. (2025). Secure and transparent banking: Explainable AI-driven federated learning model for financial fraud detection. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(4), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18040179

3. Li, M., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Chen, J., & Liu, H. (2024). FedGAT-DCNN: Advanced credit card fraud detection using federated learning, graph attention networks, and dilated convolutions. Electronics, 13(16), 3169. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13163169

4. Baabdullah, T., Alzahrani, A., Alharbi, F., & Alshammari, M. (2024). Efficiency of federated learning and blockchain in preserving privacy and enhancing the performance of credit card fraud detection systems. Future Internet, 16(6), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16060196

5. Reddy, V. V. K., Reddy, R. V. K., Munaga, M. S. K., Karnam, B., Maddila, S. K., & Kolli, C. S. (2024). Deep learning-based credit card fraud detection in federated learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 251, 124493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124493

6. Awosika, T., Shukla, R. M., & Pranggono, B. (2024). Transparency and privacy: The role of explainable AI and federated learning in financial fraud detection. IEEE Access, 12, 64551–64560. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3394528

7. Xia, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Chen, L., & Wang, Q. (2025). FinGraphFL: Financial graph-based federated learning for privacy-preserving credit card fraud detection. Mathematics, 13(9), 1396. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13091396

8. Nagraj, A. (2024). GraphQL in Wealth Management Platforms: Optimizing Data Access and Performance. British Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 16-24.

9. Takon, A. (2024). Data-Driven Threat Intelligence for Energy and Critical Asset Management. International Journal of Technology, Management and Humanities, 10(04), 253-266.

10. Kola, J. N. Longitudinal Cohort Intelligence for Self-Insured Employer Groups: A Predictive Framework for Healthcare Cost Trajectory Modeling and Proactive Risk Intervention.

11. Adepoju, S. A., & Adepoju, M. A. (2024). From Portals to Case Graphs: A Reference Architecture and Benchmark for Safety Investigation Operations with Agentic Orchestration.

12. Takon, A. (2024). Data Science Approaches to Asset Integrity Management in Offshore and Onshore Oil and Gas Operations. Multidisciplinary Innovations & Research Analysis, 5(2), 17-31.

13. Kola, J. N. (2011). An Integrated Framework for Data Mining and Distributed Database Optimization in Resource-Constrained Network Environments. SAMRIDDHI: A Journal of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2(02), 82-86.

14. Ravikumar, V. (2014). Fair and optimal resource allocation in wireless sensor networks.

15. Naidu, K. J. (2014). Secure OLAP Reporting Architectures: Integrating Role-based Access Control and Query Execution Plan Optimization for Enterprise Analytical Environments. SAMRIDDHI: A Journal of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(02), 155-159.

16. Marasani, Y. (2025). Explainable AI Frameworks for Patient-Level Claims Data Analytics. J Artif Intell Mach Learn & Data Sci, 8(1), 3382-3390.

17. Zhao, J. C., Bagchi, S., Avestimehr, S., Chan, K. S., Chaterji, S., Dimitriadis, D., Li, J., Li, N., Nourian, A., & Roth, H. R. (2024). Federated learning privacy: Attacks, defenses, applications, and policy landscape: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/3724113

18. Fu, J., Hong, Y., Ling, X., Wang, L., Ran, X., Sun, Z., Wang, W. H., Chen, Z., & Cao, Y. (2024). Differentially private federated learning: A systematic review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.08299

19. Liu, Z., Guo, J., Yang, W., Fan, J., Lam, K.-Y., & Zhao, J. (2022). Privacy-preserving aggregation in federated learning: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Big Data. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2022.3180613

20. Nagraj, A. (2022). Modernizing Legacy Banking Systems: Migration Strategies and Cost Optimization in Financial Enterprises. Frontiers in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 43-52.

21. Guembe, B., Azeta, A., Misra, S., Osamor, V. C., Fernandez-Sanz, L., & Pospelova, V. (2024). Privacy issues, attacks, countermeasures and open problems in federated learning. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 38(1), 2410504. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2024.2410504

22. Hu, K., Li, J., Ding, Y., Bai, X., & Yang, F. (2024). An overview of implementing security and privacy in federated learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10846-8

23. Xia, F., Yu, X., Zhang, J., & Yang, L. T. (2024). A survey on privacy-preserving federated learning against poisoning attacks. Cluster Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-04629-7

24. ALAMPALLY, J. (2024). Enhancing data quality and trust in AI systems through robust data engineering. Frontiers in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 3(1), 120-130.

25. Bai, L., Hu, H., Ye, Q., Li, H., Wang, L., & Xu, J. (2024). Membership inference attacks and defenses in federated learning: A survey. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.06157

26. Chen, Y., Qin, X., Wang, J., Yu, C., & Gao, W. (2020). FedHealth: A federated transfer learning framework for wearable healthcare. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 35(4), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2020.2988604

27. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2020.2975749

28. MARASANI, Y. (2024). Enterprise Readiness for Generative AI: The Critical Role of Data Engineering. Frontiers in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 3(2), 59-71.

29. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., D’Oliveira, R. G. L., Eichner, H., El Rouayheb, S., Evans, D., Gardner, J., Garrett, Z., Gascón, A., Ghazi, B., Gibbons, P. B., ... Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000083

30. Bonawitz, K., Eichner, H., Grieskamp, W., Huba, D., Ingerman, A., Ivanov, V., Kiddon, C., Konečný, J., Mazzocchi, S., McMahan, H. B., Van Overveldt, T., Petrou, D., Ramage, D., & Roselander, J. (2019). Towards federated learning at scale: System design. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 1, 374–388.

31. ALAMPALLY, J. (2024). Real-Time and Near-Real-Time Analytics in Healthcare Data Ecosystems. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 6(1), 314-324.

32. McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. y. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 1273–1282). PMLR.

33. Mukherjee, C. Ai-Driven Personalization of Power System Learning Modules Using Student Personas based on Behavioral Analysis of Grid Performance.

34. Nadia, N. Y., Rabby, H. R., Arif, M. H., Tanvir, M. I. M., Ahmed, M., & Firdaus, S. (2025, October). Scalable RNN-Based Transfer Learning for Patient Sentiment Monitoring in Telehealth Platforms. In 2025 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computing, Applications and Systems (COMPAS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

35. Takon, A. (2025). Explainable AI for Threat Modelling and Decision Support in Engineering Assets. Journal of Cyber-Physical Security and Robotics, 1(02), 46-52.

36. Mukherjee, C. (2025). Combating digital media piracy with agentic ai: Leveraging video transcription and character recognition for automated enforcement. Authorea Preprints.

37. Anifowose, K. (2025). Development and Validation of AI-Assisted Analytical Methods for Biochemical Compound Detection in Pharmaceutical Chemistry. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 8(4), 41-52.

38. Mukherjee, C. (2025). Use of Agentic AI with OpenAI and Prompt Engineering and State-of-the Art Machine Learning Algorithm to detect the patterns in IOT Device Network Intrusion Attacks. Authorea Preprints.

39. Ravikumar, V. (2025). Therapeutic Bot: Ethical Concerns in AI therapy for Neurodivergence. J Int Scient Re Rep.

40. Mukherjee, C. (2025). Use of Agentic AI with LLM and Prompt Engineering and State-of-the Art Machine Learning Algorithm to detect the patterns in IOT Device Network Intrusion Attacks. TechRxiv. August, 6.

41. Takon, A. (2025). 3D Object Detection and Localization for Industrial Threat Monitoring. Well Testing Journal, 34(S3), 850-880.

42. Mukherjee, C. (2025). Harnessing large language models and ai agents for child behavior analytics in day care: a proof of concept for next-generation parental insight using simulated data. Machinery and Production Engineering, 174(2870), 26-34.

43. Mukherjee, C. (2025). Combating digital media piracy with agentic ai: Leveraging video transcription and character recognition for automated enforcement. Authorea Preprints.

44. Cherif, A., Badhib, A., Ammar, H., Alshehri, S., Kalkatawi, M., & Imine, A. (2023). Credit card fraud detection in the era of disruptive technologies: A systematic review. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 35(1), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.11.008

45. Motie, S., & Raahemi, B. (2024). Financial fraud detection using graph neural networks: A systematic review. Expert Systems with Applications, 240, 122156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122156

46. MARASANI, Y. (2023). Machine Learning Models for Predicting Patient Treatment Switching Using Claims Data. Frontiers in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 59-66.

47. Gao, H., Kou, G., Liang, H., Zhang, H., Chao, X., Li, C.-C., & Dong, Y. (2024). Machine learning in business and finance: A literature review and research opportunities. Financial Innovation, 10, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00550-z

48. Vanini, P., Rossi, S., Zvizdic, E., & Domenig, T. (2023). Online payment fraud: From anomaly detection to risk management. Financial Innovation, 9, 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00470-y

49. Chen, C., Lee, C., Huang, S., & Peng, W. (2024). Credit card fraud detection via intelligent sampling and self-supervised learning. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 15(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3636515

50. Seera, M., Lim, C. P., Kumar, A., Dhamotharan, L., & Tan, K. H. (2024). An intelligent payment card fraud detection system. Annals of Operations Research, 334, 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04149-2

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Balaji Sathyamurthy SS. Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Fraud Detection across Financial Institutions. IJAIBDCMS [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 30 [cited 2026 Jun. 20];6(4):319-35. Available from: https://ijaibdcms.org/index.php/ijaibdcms/article/view/614